Marketers say their use of content-driven campaigns will increase in 2020, and still grow over subsequent two years.
According to a replacement report from eMarketer, 80% of
selling professionals worldwide say the utilization of content marketing
campaigns will grow. Only 2% of marketers say the utilization of content
marketing will decline, and 19% say it'll stabilize.
Moving beyond editorial-style content and social media, more
marketers are turning to non-traditional sorts of content creation.
For example, 90% of marketers say they decide to use
audio/podcasts in their campaigns in 2020. an identical percentage plans to use
emerging technology like augmented reality.
Jillian Ryan, principal analyst at eMarketer, speaks to
those survey results:
Suffering from fewer conversions for an equivalent ad spend
on your Google Ads?
Your ads could be getting click fraud. Check if you would
like to guard your ads from competitors & bots. Simple setup. Start your
free checkup today.
“Content, when
produced strategically and with regularity, are often the backbone of a
marketing and advertising plan. It should be created for a selected audience
and shared within the most relevant channel to succeed in the intended
audience. Brands are beginning to realize that content-led strategies can
inform and supply fuel for many of their other marketing and advertising
initiatives.”
Content Marketing Resources
If you’re one among those marketers getting to expand your
use of content-driven campaigns this year, confirm to see out our most-read and
most-shared resources from 2019.
Learn where to take a position some time and resources this
year with Julia McCoy’s guide to the highest 5 trends to understand in SEO
& content marketing.
Of course, if you’re outputting more content you would like
to ascertain a return thereon effort. Julia McCoy provides further guidance
with 5 creative ways to spice up your content marketing ROI.
Lastly, see what’s ahead for content marketing this year
with this text on 5 big content trends for 2020.
California Law Threatens Freelance Journalists
A new California law targeting the “gig economy” goes into
effect in January 2020. Many freelance journalists are worried that it's going
to end their careers. The law was intended to assist secure journalism jobs.
But some freelance journalists fear they're going to be losing their
livelihoods. This law can also impact content marketing since such a lot of it
relies on freelance journalism.
One person tweeted: “It doesn’t matter what profession it’s
aimed toward . the consequences are going to be devastating for freelance
writers in CA, and you ought to hear them rather than ruining their
livelihoods.”
Exemptions for Freelance Journalists?
According to the Hollywood Reporter and tweets on Twitter,
many freelancers are having a meltdown over this law.
“…the exemption for freelance journalists …contains what
some say may be a potentially career-ending requirement for a writer to stay a
contract r: If a freelance journalist writes for a magazine, newspaper or other
entity whose central mission is to disseminate the news, the law says, that
journalist is capped at writing 35 “submissions” per annum per “putative
employer.” “
Miscommunication May Have Led to Freelance Cap of
35 Articles
A Twitter discussion between the laws author, Assembly Woman
Lorena S. Gonzalez (@LorenaSGonzalez) and Randy Dotinga (@rdotinga), of the
American Society of Journalists & Authors, who attended feedback meetings
when the law was being crafted highlighted how each side , freelancers and
legislators, had not fully communicated.
California Assemblywoman Lorena S. Gonzalez tweeted:
“We agreed to form it 35 & broaden the language on
submissions. I left a gathering w/ people agreeing. i do know there have been
subsequent emails w/staff. You weren’t involved that? to not redirect all the
very kind & effective comments about how stupid i'm , just simply stating
fact.”
To which Randy responded:
“I checked our notes: The bill had submission cap at 25. We
met with you and discussed submission cap and bill language. 35 didn’t come up.
I asked if you'll do a cap of 52 if our coalition would stand down and support
the bill. You said no…
…then 1 of your staff members emailed me about revised
language with 35 cap, among other things. Reply: “We would, of course, like
better to see a better cap, but we do appreciate that it's risen to 35.” I
wanted to be friendly and figured the ship had sailed on the 35 cap”
Assembly woman Gonzalez answered:
“W discussed a 35 cap then talked at length about
broadening the definition of submission. We did both within the language.I was
actually therein meeting with you.”
Randy contradicted her assertion:
ADVERTISEMENT
“W.. don’t recall 35 arising at our meeting, and it’s not in
our notes… That being said, I might be wrong or we could have miscommunicated.”
Freelancers are Discussing on Twitter
According to Randy Dotinga (of the American Society of
Journalists & Authors), he tweeted that there are exemptions.
“There may be a business to business exemption within the
law with several criteria that you simply must meet. But albeit you meet the
standards , you'll still be blacklisted if your client doesn’t want to affect
figuring all this out. it's on them to follow the law.”
According to Randy, the law only affects writers in
California. He also tweeted that this law doesn't affect marketers. It only
targets journalists.
“And marketers! I can write many press releases on a
contract basis and it’s no problem. But i need to be placed on staff or sacked
if I write 36 freelance columns about the homeless…”
He also tweeted:
“We should return to Borello. Journalists are protected by
the primary Amendment and therefore the state constitution. Marketing writers
haven't any limitation on their work as freelancers per #AB5, yet journalists
who write do. Does that sort of targeting seem constitutional to you?”
This is what the law says:
“The bill would exempt specified occupations from the
appliance of Dynamex, and would instead provide that these occupations are
governed by Borello.
These exempt occupations would come with , among others,
licensed insurance agents, certain licensed health care professionals,
registered securities broker-dealers or investment advisers, direct sales salespersons,
land licensees, commercial fishermen, workers providing licensed barber or
cosmetology services, et al. performing work under a contract for professional
services, with another business entity, or pursuant to a subcontract within the
housing industry .“
Freelance writer Kassy Dillon tweeted:
“California is capping freelance writer articles at 35 a
year. I could pass that during a month. It’s absolutely ridiculous that the
govt here wants to harm people that prefer to freelance and have a more
flexible career.”
She also tweeted how this impacts her as a full time
student:
The author of the California law tweeted that she was
hospitable working to enhance the law. She cautioned that any changes won’t be
added before the law goes into effect.
“I will still work with freelancers, the industry &
unions that represent writers to ascertain if there are further changes that
ought to be made, especially for digital quick jobs. But, this won’t get
resolved just on twitter. And it can’t happen before January 7…”
Nevertheless, many are feeling anxiety about this new law.
One freelance journalist tweeted:
“Every single freelancer writer i do know in CA is more
scared of this than we were of Trump’s bill , which was awful for us. Every non
CA freelance writer i do know is incredibly grateful they don’t live here and
aren’t subject to this…”
Impact of California Law on Freelance Journalism
ADVERTISEMENT
There seems to be a scarcity of clarity at now in time.
On the one hand, as seen within the tweet by Randy Dotinga
cited above, there's the interpretation that certain business types are
excluded.
That would seem to be like outsourcing work to a temp
staffing company. Can a journalistic enterprise outsource their journalists? As
Randy observes, the seemingly multiple ambiguities within the laws may force
companies to prevent hiring freelancers.
An Official Creative Commons WordPress Plugin Makes Content
Attribution Easier
Creative Commons has created a WordPress plugin which makes
it easier to attribute and license content.
The plugin, simply called ‘Creative Commons’, is an upgraded
version of the organization’s old plugin called WPLicense. as long as the old
plugin wasn’t compatible with versions of WordPress beyond 3.8.1, it’s fair to
mention a replacement and/or updated plugin was overdue.
Since the plugin is updated to be compatible with the newest
version of WordPress (5.2.2) it’s compatible with Gutenberg’s new block editor.
It features eight blocks dedicated to licensing posts, pages, images, and other
sorts of media.
The plugin’s intuitive settings allow users to specify
attribution text, also as customize the background and text colors. It comes
with “one click attribution” for images which makes it especially easy to
display license information.
Several features from older versions of the plugin still
exist, like the power to line a default license and use it within the footer or
as a widget. In Appearance > Widgets, the CC License widget are often
dragged to any widget area just like the side-bar and every one other available
areas.
Users will have the choice to license a whole site, or
simply select posts, pages, and pictures . It’s also multisite compatible.
The plugin are often downloaded from the official WordPress
plugin repository here.
0 Comments
Thank You For Comments